Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

SCDSS v. Rosamond Parks

SCDSS v. Rosamond Parks
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided October 31, 2019

SCDSS v. Rosamond Parks

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Rosamond Parks, Brandon Lilley, Jimmy Kirkland, Donald Wilson, and John Doe, Defendants, Of whom Rosamond Parks is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000068

Appeal From Greenville County Katherine H. Tiffany, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-351 Submitted October 24, 2019 โ€“ Filed October 31, 2019

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Amanda B. Stiles, of Greenville, for Respondent.

Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Rosamond Parks appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (2010). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Parks's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.