State v. Fleming
State v. Fleming
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Tyrone Deangelo Fleming, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000727
Appeal From Union County Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-346 Submitted September 1, 2019 – Filed October 16, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defenders LaNelle Cantey DuRant and Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.