State v. Williams
State v. Williams
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Chris Nathaniel Williams, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-001668
Appeal From Berkeley County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-339 Submitted September 1, 2019 – Filed October 9, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and Chris Nathaniel Williams, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.