State v. Mingo
State v. Mingo
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Traevis A. Mingo, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-001679
Appeal From Lancaster County Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-325 Submitted September 1, 2019 – Filed October 9, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Traevis A. Mingo, pro se, for Appellant.
General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.