Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

State v. Mack

State v. Mack
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided October 9, 2019

State v. Mack

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Marcus Antonio Mack, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001842

Appeal From Lexington County Robert E. Hood, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-342 Submitted September 1, 2019 – Filed October 9, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defenders LaNelle Cantey DuRant and Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.