State v. Chappell
State v. Chappell
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Joseph Chappell, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000716
Appeal From Greenville County Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-345 Submitted September 1, 2019 – Filed October 9, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, and Joseph Chappell, pro se.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.