Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

State v. Arthur

State v. Arthur
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided November 13, 2019

State v. Arthur

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. James Lamont Arthur, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002595

Appeal From Horry County Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-364 Submitted October 1, 2019 – Filed November 13, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and James Lamont Arthur, pro se.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.