Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

State v. Seabrook

State v. Seabrook
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided December 31, 2019
State v. Seabrook

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Katherine Lathara Anne Seabrook, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000644

Appeal From Charleston County J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-409

Submitted November 1, 2019 – Filed December 31, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.