Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

State v. Abdullah

State v. Abdullah
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided December 31, 2019

State v. Abdullah

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002217

Appeal From Sumter County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-406 Submitted November 1, 2019 – Filed December 31, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah, pro se.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. 1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.