Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019

SCDSS v. Venda Dill

SCDSS v. Venda Dill
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided December 5, 2019

SCDSS v. Venda Dill

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Venda Nicole Dill and Bradley McAbee, Defendants, Of whom Venda Nicole Dill is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000756

Appeal From Spartanburg County James F. Fraley, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-379 Submitted November 15, 2019 โ€“ Filed December 5, 2019

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Deborah Murdock Gentry, of Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of Mauldin; and Robert C. Rhoden, III, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Spartanburg, both for Respondent.

Jacqueline Alicia Moss, of Law Firm of Jacqueline Moss, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Venda Nicole Dill appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Dill's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.