State v. Wittich
State v. Wittich
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Deante Dominic-Ali Wittich, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-000732
Appeal From Richland County R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-041 Submitted January 1, 2020 – Filed February 12, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
John Dennis Delgado, of John Delgado Attorney at Law, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.