State v. Gainey
State v. Gainey
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Robert Len Gainey, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-001396
Appeal From Darlington County Roger E. Henderson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-081 Submitted February 1, 2020 – Filed March 25, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and GEATHERS, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.