Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2020

State v. McEachern

State v. McEachern
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided March 11, 2020

State v. McEachern

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Rasheed Daevon McEachern, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002423

Appeal From Dorchester County Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-066 Submitted February 1, 2020 – Filed March 11, 2020

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, both for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.