State v. Dimitroff
State v. Dimitroff
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Stanley Anthony Dimitroff II, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000501
Appeal From Oconee County R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-068 Submitted February 1, 2020 – Filed March 11, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.