State v. Grant
State v. Grant
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Barrington Wayne Grant, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000134
Appeal From Allendale County and Barnwell County William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-059 Submitted January 1, 2020 – Filed March 4, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia; and Barrington Wayne Grant, pro se, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.