State v. Hart
State v. Hart
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. John Joseph Hart, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000827
Appeal From Anderson County R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-115 Submitted March 1, 2020 – Filed April 29, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, and John Joseph Hart, pro se, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.