In the Interest of Matthew K.
In the Interest of Matthew K.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals In the Interest of Matthew K., a Juvenile under the age of Seventeen, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-001002
Appeal From Pickens County Tarita A. Dunbar, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-094 Submitted February 1, 2020 – Filed April 8, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.