State v. Rowan
State v. Rowan
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Scott Richard Rowan, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000813
Appeal From Horry County Larry B. Hyman, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-142 Submitted April 1, 2020 – Filed May 20, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and Scott Richard Rowan, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and GEATHERS and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.