State v. Ervin
State v. Ervin
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Jarnelle Ladarius Ervin, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000973
Appeal From York County John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-168 Submitted May 1, 2020 – Filed June 3, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of Columbia, and Jarnelle Ladarius Ervin, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.