SCDSS v. Hopkins
SCDSS v. Hopkins
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Davieyonna Chansitie Hopkins, Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000917
Appeal From Spartanburg County Usha J. Bridges, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-258 Submitted August 20, 2020 โ Filed August 28, 2020
AFFIRMED
John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Erick Matthew Barbare, of The Barbare Law Firm, of Mauldin, for Respondent.
Jamia Diann Foster, of Law Office of Jamia D. Foster LLC, of Spartanburg, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Davieyonna Chansitie Hopkins appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Hopkins's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1 HUFF, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.