Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2020

SCDSS v. Giffin-Watson

SCDSS v. Giffin-Watson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided September 16, 2020

SCDSS v. Giffin-Watson

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Nicole Marie Giffin-Watson and Michael Seth Keener, Defendants, Of whom Nicole Marie Giffin-Watson is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-000404

Appeal From Horry County Ronald R. Norton, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-267 Submitted September 11, 2020 โ€“ Filed September 16, 2020

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Ernest Joseph Jarrett, of Jenkinson Jarrett & Kellahan, PA, of Kingstree, for Respondent.

Michael Julius Schwartz, of Russell B. Long, PA, and Heather Marie Moore, of Axelrod & Associates, PA, both of Myrtle Beach, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Nicole Marie Giffin-Watson appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Giffin-Watson's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.