State v. Kelly
State v. Kelly
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Kyrief Deshawn Larnelle Kelly, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-002555
Appeal From Charleston County Thomas L. Hughston, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-288 Submitted October 1, 2020 – Filed October 14, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and Kyrief Deshawn Larnelle Kelly, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.