State v. Cornish
State v. Cornish
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Larry Cornish, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-001866
Appeal From Fairfield County Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-287 Submitted October 1, 2020 – Filed October 14, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and Larry Cornish, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.