Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2020

SCDSS v. Burke

SCDSS v. Burke
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided November 9, 2020

SCDSS v. Burke

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Sarah Ann Burke, Jason Ulrich, and Micah Grant Vincent, Defendants, Of whom Sarah Ann Burke is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-000585

Appeal From Edgefield County W. Greg Seigler, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-308 Submitted November 5, 2020 โ€“ Filed November 9, 2020

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Lillia Ann Gray, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Lexington, for Respondent.

Clarke Wardlaw McCants, IV, of Nance & McCants, of Aiken, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Sarah Ann Burke appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Burke's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 THOMAS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.