Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2020

SCDSS v. Amanda Session

SCDSS v. Amanda Session
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided December 4, 2020

SCDSS v. Amanda Session

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Amanda Marie Smith Session, Randi Lee Session, and Allen Session, Defendants, Of whom Amanda Marie Smith Session is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-000956

Appeal From Horry County Ronald R. Norton, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-332 Submitted November 17, 2020 โ€“ Filed December 4, 2020

AFFIRMED

Melanie Carol Nicholson, of Law Office of Melanie C.

Nicholson, of North Myrtle Beach, for Appellant.

Ernest Joseph Jarrett, of Jenkinson Jarrett & Kellahan, PA, of Kingstree, for Respondent.

Michael Julius Schwartz, of Russell B. Long, PA, and Heather Marie Moore, of Axelrod & Associates, PA, both of Myrtle Beach, for the Guardians ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Amanda Marie Smith Session appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Session's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.