State v. Bearden
State v. Bearden
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State of South Carolina, Respondent, v. Harlin A. Bearden, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000752
Appeal From Greenwood County R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-025 Submitted January 1, 2021 – Filed January 27, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re the Care & Treatment of McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
THOMAS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.