Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021

SCDSS v.Lamar

SCDSS v.Lamar
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided January 7, 2021

SCDSS v.Lamar

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Alexus Lamar and Demitrius Baxter, Defendants, of whom Alexus Lamar is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-000827

Appeal From York County Thomas Henry White, IV, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-007 Submitted December 22, 2020 โ€“ Filed January 7, 2021

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks, Attorney at Law, of Greenville; and Nathan James Sheldon, of The Law Office of Nathan J. Sheldon, LLC, of Rock Hill, for Appellant.

Christopher Craig Jackson, of Chris Jackson Law Firm LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Rebecca T. McNerney, of Waxhaw, North Carolina, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Alexus Lamar appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Lamar's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.