Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021

State v. Moise

State v. Moise
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided March 31, 2021

State v. Moise

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Mario Chanel Moise, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001172

Appeal From York County Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-102 Submitted March 1, 2021 – Filed March 31, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.