Jackson v. State of SC
Jackson v. State of SC
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Tre'Vaughn Jackson, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2017-001172
Appeal From Sumter County Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-098 Submitted February 1, 2021 – Filed March 31, 2021
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Assistant Attorney General Brianna Lynn Schill, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the Petition, Appendix, and briefs, we dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.