Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021

State v. Wilson

State v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided April 28, 2021

State v. Wilson

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Willie Jerome Wilson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000576

Appeal From Richland County L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-138 Submitted March 1, 2021 – Filed April 28, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1 KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.