State v. Rich
State v. Rich
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Risheen G. Rich, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001785
Appeal From Sumter County Thomas L. Hughston, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-137 Submitted April 1, 2021 – Filed April 28, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.