Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021

SCDSS v. Slade

SCDSS v. Slade
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided April 6, 2021

SCDSS v. Slade

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Lakesha C. Slade and William Roseboro, Defendants, Of whom Lakesha C. Slade is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-001330

Appeal From York County David G. Guyton, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-114 Submitted March 18, 2021 โ€“ Filed April 6, 2021

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Kathryn J. Walsh, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Rock Hill; and Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.

Donae Alecia Minor, of Minor Law Offices LLC, of Fort Mill; and Rebecca T. McNerney, of Waxhaw, North Carolina, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Lakesha C. Slade appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Slade's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.