State v. Smith
State v. Smith
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Courtney Anthony Smith, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000857
Appeal From Marion County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-218 Submitted May 1, 2021 – Filed June 16, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.