Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021

State v. Smith

State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided June 16, 2021

State v. Smith

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Courtney Anthony Smith, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000857

Appeal From Marion County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-218 Submitted May 1, 2021 – Filed June 16, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.