State v. Seldon
State v. Seldon
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Lamont Seldon, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000592
Appeal From Horry County Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-219 Submitted May 1, 2021 – Filed June 16, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia; and Lamont Seldon, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.