Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021

State v. Heatley

State v. Heatley
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided July 14, 2021

State v. Heatley

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Andre Tyrone Heatley, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000165

Appeal From Richland County DeAndrea G. Benjamin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-265 Submitted June 1, 2021 – Filed July 14, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Andre Tyrone Heatley, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ. concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.