Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021

State v. Cummings

State v. Cummings
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided July 14, 2021

State v. Cummings

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Tristian Cummings, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000665

Appeal From Greenville County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-266 Submitted June 1, 2021 – Filed July 14, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, and Tristian Cummings, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1 KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.