Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021

SCDSS v. Dunster

SCDSS v. Dunster
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided October 12, 2021

SCDSS v. Dunster

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Cherod Johnson and Cidney Dunster, Defendants, Of whom Cidney Dunster is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000220

Appeal From Darlington County Cely Anne Brigman, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-355 Submitted October 7, 2021 โ€“ Filed October 12, 2021

AFFIRMED

Sarah Crawford Campbell, of Campbell Law, LLC, of Chesterfield, for Appellant.

Christopher Craig Jackson, of Chris Jackson Law Firm LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Stuart Wesley Snow, Jr., of Snow & Bailey Law Firm, P.A., of Florence, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Cidney Dunster appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Dunster's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.