SCDSS v. Malaysia Freeman
SCDSS v. Malaysia Freeman
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Malaysia Freeman, Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2021-000492
Appeal From Greenville County Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-419 Submitted November 12, 2021 โ Filed November 19, 2021
AFFIRMED
John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Richard Whitney Allen and Marianthe Kolokithas Richey, both of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Malaysia Freeman appeals from the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Freeman's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1 WILLIAMS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.