State v. Tequan M. Holmes
State v. Tequan M. Holmes
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Tequan Martrell Holmes, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001313
Appeal From Aiken County Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-407 Submitted November 1, 2021 – Filed November 17, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Tequan Martrell Holmes, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.