State v. Patterson
State v. Patterson
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Yashawnus Patterson, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2020-000979
Appeal From Richland County Jocelyn Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-391 Submitted October 1, 2021 – Filed November 3, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek and Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, both of Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.