Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021

SCDSS v. Cook

SCDSS v. Cook
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided December 9, 2021

SCDSS v. Cook

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Ashton L. Black - deceased, Charles N. Dunn, and Joshua Cook, Defendants, Of whom Joshua Cook is the Appellant and Ashton L. Black - deceased and Charles N. Dunn are Respondents.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000495

Appeal From Oconee County Karen F. Ballenger, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-441 Submitted December 2, 2021 โ€“ Filed December 9, 2021

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Thomas Harper Collins, of Harper Collins LLC, of Anderson, for Respondent Ashton Black.

Ashley Phillips Case, of Fountain Inn, and Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, both for Respondent South Carolina Department of Social Services.

Kimberly Welchel Pease, of Seneca, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Joshua Cook appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Cook's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.