Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2022

SCDSS v. Brittany McKnight

SCDSS v. Brittany McKnight
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided February 10, 2022

SCDSS v. Brittany McKnight

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Brittany McKnight and Stevie McClinton, Defendants, and John Doe and Jane Doe, Respondents, Of whom Brittany McKnight is the Appellant and Stevie McClinton is a Respondent.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000871

Appeal From York County Thomas Henry White, IV, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-067 Submitted February 9, 2022 โ€“ Filed February 10, 2022

AFFIRMED Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for Appellant.

L. Sherril Davis, of L. Sherril Law, LLC, of Rock Hill for Respondent Stevie McClinton.

James Fletcher Thompson, of Thompson Dove Law Group LLC, of Spartanburg for Respondents John and Jane Doe.

Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent South Carolina Department of Social Services.

Donae Alecia Minor, of Minor Law Offices LLC, of Rock Hill, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Brittany McKnight (Mother) appeals from the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Mother's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.