State v. Dominick Antonio Thompson
State v. Dominick Antonio Thompson
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Dominick Antonio Thompson, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001034
Appeal From Spartanburg County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-154 Submitted January 1, 2022 – Filed March 30, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, and Dominick Antonio Thompson, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 WILLIAMS, C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.