Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2022

State v. Dominick Antonio Thompson

State v. Dominick Antonio Thompson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided March 30, 2022

State v. Dominick Antonio Thompson

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Dominick Antonio Thompson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001034

Appeal From Spartanburg County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-154 Submitted January 1, 2022 – Filed March 30, 2022

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, and Dominick Antonio Thompson, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1 WILLIAMS, C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.