Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2022

State v. William Bruce Clark, Jr.

State v. William Bruce Clark, Jr.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided March 23, 2022

State v. William Bruce Clark, Jr.

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. William Bruce Clark, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2020-000385

Appeal From Marion County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-135 Submitted February 1, 2022 – Filed March 23, 2022

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.