State v. Treshawn Markeese Jenkins
State v. Treshawn Markeese Jenkins
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Treshawn Markeese Jenkins, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000360
Appeal From Orangeburg County Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-125 Submitted January 1, 2022 – Filed March 23, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Treshawn Markeese Jenkins, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 WILLIAMS, C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.