State v. Pedro A. Grado Torresshaw
State v. Pedro A. Grado Torresshaw
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Pedro A. Grado Torresshaw, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001234
Appeal From Sumter County George M. McFaddin, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-126 Submitted January 1, 2022 – Filed March 23, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and Pedro A. Grado Torresshaw, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se briefs and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 WILLIAMS, C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.