State v. Donald Frank Halstead, III
State v. Donald Frank Halstead, III
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Donald Frank Halstead, III, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001863
Appeal From Horry County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-122 Submitted January 1, 2022 – Filed March 23, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Donald Frank Halstead, III, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 WILLIAMS, C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.