THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals William B. Chisholm, Appellant, v. Guadalupe Juarez, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001750

Appeal From Greenville County Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-098 Submitted February 1, 2022 – Filed March 9, 2022

AFFIRMED

William B. Chisholm, of Greenville, pro se.

Guadalupe Juarez, of Fountain Inn, pro se.

PER CURIAM: William B. Chisholm appeals an order from the circuit court affirming the ruling of the magistrate court. On appeal, Chisholm argues (1) "Did [the circuit court] err in thinking that the transcript of the case [it] was given would be the same as that given to [Chisholm]" and (2) "Did [Chisholm] err in believing that the record of transcript he was given was real?" Because Chisholm did not provide arguments or supporting authority for his issues, these issues are deemed abandoned. Accordingly, we affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: First Sav. Bank v. McLean, 314 S.C. 361, 363, 444 S.E.2d 513, 514 (1994) (stating an argument is deemed abandoned on appeal when the appellant fails to provide arguments or supporting authority).

AFFIRMED.1 THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.