State v. Sincere Ja Ray Dinkins
State v. Sincere Ja Ray Dinkins
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Sincere Ja Ray Dinkins, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001763
Appeal From Sumter County Thomas L. Hughston, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-198 Submitted March 1, 2022 – Filed May 18, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, and Sincere Ja Ray Dinkins, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.