State v. Frazier Ray Singleton
State v. Frazier Ray Singleton
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Frazier Ray Singleton, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2020-000131
Appeal From Sumter County R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-188 Submitted March 1, 2022 – Filed May 11, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 GEATHERS and HILL, JJ., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.